CoSchedule has earned its place as a go-to marketing calendar for content teams, especially those running WordPress blogs. The integrated editorial workflow and ReQueue automation make it genuinely useful for coordinating marketing efforts. But when teams start growing, the per-user pricing model becomes a problem. At $19-59 per user per month, a five-person team could pay $295 or more before even considering the Twitter/X add-on ($8-25 per profile). That is a steep price for social media scheduling.
If you are searching for alternatives to CoSchedule because per-user fees have blown up your budget, you are not alone. This guide covers 11 alternatives with flat-rate or more affordable pricing models, so you can keep your team on the same platform without multiplying costs.
TL;DR – Best CoSchedule Alternatives
- Viraly – Best for flat-rate pricing with content recycling. $19-99/month for entire teams with unlimited posts on higher tiers, AI caption variations, and 10 platforms including TikTok and Threads.
- SocialBee – Best for content category scheduling. $29-99/month with advanced content recycling via categories, DALL-E image generation, and similar evergreen workflow to ReQueue.
- Publer – Best budget option. Just $4-10/month per account with 14+ platforms, spintax for content variations, and direct Instagram connection without Facebook Business Manager.
Why People Look for CoSchedule Alternatives
CoSchedule does many things well. The marketing calendar view is genuinely helpful for planning campaigns, and ReQueue automatically reshares evergreen content without constant manual work. The WordPress plugin integration remains one of the best in the industry for bloggers. But several pain points push teams toward alternatives to CoSchedule.
Per-user pricing adds up fast. Social Calendar starts at $19/user and Agency Calendar at $59/user. A team of five on Agency Calendar pays nearly $300/month before adding anything extra. Look for flat-rate plans where “$49/month for 5 users” replaces “$49/user/month” – the difference is hundreds of dollars at scale.
Twitter/X costs extra. CoSchedule charges $8-25/month per profile as an add-on, which surprises users who expected it included. Most alternatives bundle Twitter/X into base pricing or restrict it to paid plans without per-profile surcharges.
ReQueue has limits. The content recycling works well for basic evergreen scheduling, but frequency customization is somewhat limited. If you rely heavily on ReQueue, look for alternatives with more sophisticated category-based recycling or AI-powered caption variations to keep recycled content fresh.
Social inbox is gated. Engagement features only appear on Agency Calendar or higher. Some tools like Agorapulse offer better inbox features (though with their own per-user pricing), while others like Viraly focus purely on publishing. Know what you actually need before paying for inbox access.
WordPress integration is a strength worth noting. CoSchedule’s WordPress plugin lets you schedule social posts alongside blog content directly from the editor. If this workflow matters to you, verify your alternative offers comparable integration – most do not match this depth.
11 CoSchedule Alternatives
1. Viraly
Viraly addresses the biggest CoSchedule complaint with genuinely flat-rate pricing. The Influencer plan costs $19/month total, not per user. Business ($49/month) includes 5 team members and 15 profiles, while Agency ($99/month) covers 15 team members, 50 profiles, and unlimited posts. Compare that to CoSchedule Agency Calendar at $59/user – a team of three would pay $177/month for fewer profiles.
Content recycling works similarly to ReQueue but adds AI caption variations. Instead of resharing the exact same post, Viraly generates 3-10 caption variations to keep recycled content fresh. This helps avoid the staleness that comes from obvious reposts. The recycling intervals range from weekly to yearly with custom date options.
- Key features: Flat-rate pricing with team members included, content recycling with AI variations, first comment on 4 platforms, thread replies on Threads/Mastodon/Bluesky/X, TikTok Photo Mode (35 images), LinkedIn document posts
- Platforms: 10 platforms including TikTok, Threads, Mastodon, Bluesky, YouTube, Pinterest
- Pricing: Free ($0, 3 profiles, 10 posts/month), Influencer ($19/mo), Business ($49/mo), Agency ($99/mo)
- Limitations: No social inbox (publishing-focused), free plan limited to 10 posts/month, team members start at Business plan
CoSchedule vs Viraly
| Feature | CoSchedule | Viraly |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per-user ($19-59/user) | $19/mo (5 profiles) – $99/mo (50 profiles) – $2 per profile thereafter |
| Team members | Extra cost per user | Included (5-15 per plan) |
| Content recycling | ReQueue (same content) | AI caption variations |
| Twitter/X | Paid add-on ($8-25/profile) | Included |
| Best for | WordPress blog teams | Teams wanting flat-rate + recycling |
Bottom line: Best for teams frustrated by per-user pricing who want content recycling without multiplying costs as the team grows.
2. RecurPost
RecurPost built its entire platform around content recycling, making it the closest match to ReQueue users. Evergreen content gets stored in libraries that automatically cycle through your posting queue. You can set custom repost frequencies, organize by season or campaign, and the content never runs dry.
The pricing model differs significantly from CoSchedule. Plans are based on profiles rather than users, starting at $9/month for 2 profiles. While team members are limited (1-3 depending on plan), you are not paying per seat. The Agency plan at $79/month includes 20 profiles – roughly equivalent to CoSchedule pricing for a single user on Agency Calendar.
- Key features: Evergreen content libraries, automatic republishing, seasonal content organization, social inbox, AI content assistant, Instagram DM automation
- Platforms: 10 platforms including Threads and Bluesky (no Mastodon)
- Pricing: Starter ($9/mo), Personal ($25/mo), Agency ($79/mo) – no free plan
- Limitations: No free plan available, interface feels dated, limited team members per plan, occasional account disconnection issues reported
CoSchedule vs RecurPost
| Feature | CoSchedule | RecurPost |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per-user ($19-59/user) | Per-profile ($9-79/mo flat) |
| Content recycling | ReQueue (basic) | Core feature (advanced libraries) |
| Twitter/X | Paid add-on ($8-25/profile) | Included |
| WordPress integration | Native plugin | No |
| Best for | Blog-focused marketing teams | Evergreen content specialists |
Bottom line: The content recycling specialist. Best for users who rely heavily on ReQueue and want similar functionality at lower cost.
3. Buffer
Buffer offers the simplest scheduling experience as an alternative to CoSchedule. The interface stays clean and uncluttered, making it easy to learn quickly. Buffer pioneered accessible social media scheduling and maintains that straightforward approach today.
The pricing model uses per-channel fees rather than per-user. Essentials costs $6/channel on the 1-10 channel tier, so 5 channels runs $30/month. Team plan for unlimited users costs $12/channel. This scales better than CoSchedule for teams but worse for accounts with many profiles. The free plan includes 3 channels with 10 scheduled posts per channel.
- Key features: Clean interface, AI assistant on all plans, engagement features for comments, Start Page (link in bio), unlimited users on Team plan
- Platforms: 11+ platforms including Threads, Bluesky, Mastodon, Google Business Profile
- Pricing: Free (3 channels), Essentials ($6/channel/mo), Team ($12/channel/mo)
- Limitations: No content recycling feature, per-channel pricing adds up with many profiles, analytics limited compared to dedicated tools, no first comment on free plan
CoSchedule vs Buffer
| Feature | CoSchedule | Buffer |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per-user ($19-59/user) | Per-channel ($6-12/channel) |
| Content recycling | ReQueue included | Not available |
| Twitter/X | Paid add-on ($8-25/profile) | Included |
| Free plan | 1 profile, 15 posts | 3 channels, 30 posts |
| Best for | Marketing calendar + recycling | Simple, clean scheduling |
Bottom line: Best for teams wanting simplicity over features. Missing content recycling makes it a partial CoSchedule replacement.
4. Hootsuite
Hootsuite offers enterprise-grade features but at enterprise-grade pricing. The Standard plan starts at $99/user/month ($149 without annual commitment), making it more expensive than CoSchedule per user. However, Hootsuite includes features CoSchedule charges extra for: social listening via Talkwalker, competitor benchmarking, and a unified inbox on all plans.
For large organizations already invested in the Hootsuite ecosystem or needing advanced social listening, the platform delivers comprehensive capabilities. The streams-based monitoring dashboard remains useful for real-time engagement. OwlyWriter AI helps generate content across the platform.
- Key features: Social listening (Talkwalker), competitor benchmarking, unified inbox, bulk scheduling (350 posts), approval workflows, employee advocacy (Enterprise)
- Platforms: 10+ platforms including Threads, Bluesky (monitoring only), WhatsApp (inbox only)
- Pricing: Standard ($99/user/mo), Advanced ($249/mo), Enterprise ($16,000+/year) – no free plan
- Limitations: No free plan, expensive per-user pricing, no content recycling, no first comment automation, many features locked to Enterprise tier
CoSchedule vs Hootsuite
| Feature | CoSchedule | Hootsuite |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per-user ($19-59/user) | Per-user ($99-149/user) |
| Content recycling | ReQueue included | Not available |
| Social listening | Not included | Talkwalker included |
| Social inbox | Agency Calendar only | All plans |
| Best for | Blog marketing teams | Enterprise social listening |
Bottom line: More expensive than CoSchedule with similar per-user pricing model. Only makes sense if you need social listening or enterprise features CoSchedule lacks.
5. Later
Later started as an Instagram-first scheduler and still offers the best visual planning experience for that platform. The grid preview shows exactly how posts will appear in your feed before publishing. For brands where Instagram aesthetics matter, this visual planning alone justifies consideration.
Later uses a social set model rather than per-user pricing. The Growth plan at $50/month includes 2 social sets (16 profiles total) and 2 users. Scale at $110/month bumps to 6 social sets (48 profiles) and 4 users. This scales better than CoSchedule for teams with moderate profile counts.
- Key features: Visual grid planner, Instagram-first features, Link in Bio (Linkin.bio), influencer marketing platform (Later Influence), social inbox on Growth+
- Platforms: 8 platforms including TikTok, Threads, Snapchat (no Twitter/X, no Mastodon, no Bluesky)
- Pricing: Starter ($25/mo, 30 posts/profile), Growth ($50/mo), Scale ($110/mo) – no free plan
- Limitations: No Twitter/X support (discontinued), no free plan, Starter plan limited to 30 posts/profile/month, no content recycling, Pinterest analytics limited to 3 months on all plans
CoSchedule vs Later
| Feature | CoSchedule | Later |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per-user ($19-59/user) | Social sets ($25-110/mo flat) |
| Content recycling | ReQueue included | Not available |
| Twitter/X | Paid add-on | Not supported |
| Visual grid planner | No | Yes (Instagram-first) |
| Best for | Blog + multi-platform teams | Instagram-focused brands |
Bottom line: Best for Instagram-focused brands wanting visual planning. The lack of Twitter/X support makes it incomplete for many marketing teams.
6. SocialBee
SocialBee offers the closest equivalent to CoSchedule’s ReQueue through content categories. Instead of one recycling queue, you organize posts into themed categories (tips, promotions, quotes, etc.) with individual posting schedules. Posts automatically cycle through each category, and you can set different frequencies per content type.
The AI Copilot goes beyond caption generation. Enter your website URL and it extracts company details, suggests content categories, and generates ready-to-edit posts with captions, emojis, and hashtags. DALL-E 3 integration creates custom images from prompts. Pricing starts at $29/month for 5 profiles with flat-rate team access rather than per-user fees.
- Key features: Content categories with individual schedules, evergreen recycling, post variations, AI Copilot with strategy builder, DALL-E 3 image generation, social inbox
- Platforms: 10 platforms including Bluesky, Google Business Profile (no Mastodon direct – reminders only)
- Pricing: Bootstrap ($29/mo), Accelerate ($49/mo), Pro ($99/mo) – no free plan
- Limitations: No free plan, learning curve for category system, Bootstrap/Accelerate limited to 1 user per workspace, YouTube analytics only keeps 30 days of data
CoSchedule vs SocialBee
| Feature | CoSchedule | SocialBee |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per-user ($19-59/user) | Flat-rate ($29-99/mo) |
| Content recycling | ReQueue (single queue) | Category-based (more control) |
| Twitter/X | Paid add-on ($8-25/profile) | Included |
| WordPress integration | Native plugin | No |
| Best for | WordPress blog teams | Advanced content categorization |
Bottom line: The best ReQueue alternative with even more sophisticated content organization. Ideal for teams wanting advanced evergreen automation without per-user pricing.
7. Publer
Publer delivers the most affordable alternative to CoSchedule at $4-10/month per social account. A team managing 10 accounts pays roughly $40-100/month total compared to potentially hundreds on CoSchedule. The free plan includes 3 accounts (no Twitter/X) with 10 scheduled posts each.
Despite budget pricing, Publer includes features missing from pricier competitors. Direct Instagram connection works without Facebook Business Manager. LinkedIn PDF carousel support enables document-style posts. Spintax syntax creates content variations for recycling (write {Hi|Hello|Hey} and posts rotate through options). The platform supports 14+ platforms including Telegram, WordPress, and Mastodon.
- Key features: Budget pricing, 14+ platforms, direct Instagram connection, LinkedIn PDF carousels, spintax content variations, AI Assist with GPT-4 and DALL-E 3, Link in Bio
- Platforms: 14+ including WordPress, Telegram, Mastodon, Bluesky
- Pricing: Free (3 accounts, no Twitter), Professional ($5/account/mo), Business ($10/account/mo)
- Limitations: Twitter/X requires paid plan, analytics only on Business plan, no unified inbox, basic analytics compared to dedicated tools, TikTok has 50MB file limit
CoSchedule vs Publer
| Feature | CoSchedule | Publer |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per-user ($19-59/user) | Per-account ($5-10/account) |
| Content recycling | ReQueue (automated) | Spintax (manual variations) |
| Platforms | 13 platforms | 14+ platforms |
| Free plan | 1 profile, 15 posts | 3 accounts, 30 posts |
| Best for | Marketing calendar workflow | Budget-conscious teams |
Bottom line: Best budget CoSchedule alternative. Remarkable value for solopreneurs and small teams who need wide platform coverage without enterprise pricing.
8. Sendible
Sendible targets agencies with client management features and white-label options. The platform bundles users and profiles together rather than charging per user: Creator ($29/month) includes 1 user and 6 profiles, while Traction ($89/month) includes 4 users and 24 profiles. This bundling often works out cheaper than CoSchedule for agency teams.
Smart Queues handle content recycling similar to ReQueue, automatically republishing evergreen content on schedule. The white-label option (starting at $268/month on Advanced plans) lets agencies present the platform under their own branding. Client Connect enables secure profile onboarding without sharing credentials.
- Key features: Bundled user/profile pricing, Smart Queues for recycling, white-label option, client dashboards, Priority Inbox, approval workflows, first comment (Instagram)
- Platforms: Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, Twitter/X, TikTok, YouTube, Google Business, Threads, Bluesky (no Pinterest noted)
- Pricing: Creator ($29/mo), Traction ($89/mo), Scale ($199/mo), Advanced ($299/mo) – no free plan
- Limitations: No free plan, big price jump between tiers, Instagram DMs not supported, content library requires Scale plan, white-label requires Advanced plan
CoSchedule vs Sendible
| Feature | CoSchedule | Sendible |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per-user ($19-59/user) | Bundled tiers ($29-299/mo) |
| Content recycling | ReQueue | Smart Queues |
| White-label | No | Yes (Advanced plan) |
| WordPress integration | Native plugin | No |
| Best for | Blog-focused teams | Agencies needing white-label |
Bottom line: Best for agencies wanting white-label capabilities and bundled team pricing. The tiered structure works well if your team size matches a plan tier.
9. SocialPilot
SocialPilot stands out for bulk scheduling, supporting up to 500 posts at once via CSV upload. For content teams that plan months ahead or manage high-volume accounts, this capacity exceeds most competitors. The pricing bundles accounts and users together rather than per-user fees: Standard at $100/month includes 15 accounts and 3 users.
The AI Pilot feature helps generate and refine captions with translation support for 10 languages. Social inbox covers Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, and Google Business reviews. White-label reports are available on Premium plans, and white-label dashboards on Ultimate.
- Key features: Bulk scheduling (500 posts), bundled account/user pricing, AI Pilot for content, social inbox, white-label reports and dashboards, client approval workflows
- Platforms: 13 platforms including Threads, Bluesky, Tumblr
- Pricing: Essentials ($50/mo), Standard ($100/mo), Premium ($200/mo), Ultimate (custom) – 14-day free trial
- Limitations: TikTok via mobile reminder only, bulk upload limited to text and links (no images/videos), no Twitter thread support, Instagram Stories require mobile app, no free plan
CoSchedule vs SocialPilot
| Feature | CoSchedule | SocialPilot |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per-user ($19-59/user) | Bundled tiers ($50-200/mo) |
| Bulk scheduling | Limited | 500 posts at once |
| Content recycling | ReQueue included | Basic |
| WordPress integration | Native plugin | No |
| Best for | Marketing calendar workflow | High-volume bulk scheduling |
Bottom line: Best for high-volume scheduling needs. The 500-post bulk upload is unmatched, but TikTok limitations may frustrate video-focused teams.
10. Agorapulse
Agorapulse offers the strongest social inbox as an alternative to CoSchedule. The unified inbox handles comments, DMs, and mentions across platforms with team assignment, collision detection, and saved replies. If engagement management is a priority that CoSchedule’s limited inbox cannot meet, Agorapulse delivers.
However, Agorapulse uses per-user pricing similar to CoSchedule. Standard costs $79/user/month (annual), Professional $119/user, Advanced $149/user. Twitter/X requires an additional add-on at $29-69/profile/month – even steeper than CoSchedule’s Twitter surcharge. The free plan exists but limits to 3 profiles and 10 scheduled posts total.
- Key features: Best-in-class social inbox, ROI tracking, queue recycling (Advanced+), competitor reports, social listening add-on, AI writing assistant
- Platforms: 10+ platforms including Threads, Bluesky (Twitter/X requires add-on)
- Pricing: Free (3 profiles, 10 posts), Standard ($79/user/mo), Professional ($119/user/mo), Advanced ($149/user/mo)
- Limitations: Per-user pricing like CoSchedule, Twitter/X requires paid add-on ($29-69/profile), queue recycling only on Advanced+, free plan very limited (10 posts total)
CoSchedule vs Agorapulse
| Feature | CoSchedule | Agorapulse |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per-user ($19-59/user) | Per-user ($79-149/user) |
| Twitter/X add-on | $8-25/profile | $29-69/profile |
| Social inbox | Basic (Agency only) | Best-in-class (all plans) |
| Content recycling | ReQueue included | Advanced+ only |
| Best for | Budget-conscious teams | Engagement-focused teams |
Bottom line: Best social inbox but does not solve the per-user pricing problem. Consider only if engagement features justify potentially higher total cost than CoSchedule.
11. Loomly
Loomly emphasizes team collaboration and approval workflows. The platform guides content through customizable approval stages with commenting, versioning, and clear status tracking. For teams where content review processes matter, Loomly’s workflow tools are well-designed.
Pricing recently shifted to fewer tiers with higher prices. Starter costs $65/month (annual: ~$49) for 3 users and 12 social accounts. Beyond jumps to $332/month for unlimited users and 60 accounts. A limited free plan allows 5 posts per month. The bundled approach avoids per-user fees, but the gap between Starter and Beyond creates an awkward middle ground.
- Key features: Strong approval workflows, post ideas and inspiration, Interactions Manager for engagement, recurring posts, Loomly Studio editor, Snapchat support (unique)
- Platforms: 10 platforms including Threads, Snapchat, Bluesky
- Pricing: Free (5 posts/mo), Starter ($65/mo), Beyond ($332/mo), Enterprise (custom)
- Limitations: Large price jump from Starter to Beyond, free plan very limited (5 posts), no content recycling mentioned, limited analytics compared to dedicated tools, recent price increases reported by users
CoSchedule vs Loomly
| Feature | CoSchedule | Loomly |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per-user ($19-59/user) | Bundled tiers ($65-332/mo) |
| Content recycling | ReQueue included | Not available |
| Approval workflows | Basic | Advanced (customizable stages) |
| WordPress integration | Native plugin | No |
| Best for | Blog marketing + recycling | Teams needing approval workflows |
Bottom line: Best for teams prioritizing approval workflows. The pricing tier gap may force teams into Beyond earlier than budgeted.
Quick Comparison: CoSchedule Alternatives Pricing at Scale
Entry prices can be misleading. This table shows what each CoSchedule alternative actually costs at different team and profile sizes.
| Tool | 5 Profiles | 15 Profiles | 50 Profiles | Free Plan |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CoSchedule | $19-59/user + $8-25 per X profile | $57-177/3 users + add-ons | Custom pricing | 1 profile, 15 posts, 1 user |
| Viraly | $19/mo, 200 posts, 1 user | $49/mo, 500 posts, 5 users | $99/mo, unlimited, 15 users | 3 profiles, 10 posts, 1 user |
| RecurPost | $25/mo, unlimited, 1 user | $79/mo + $16 add-on, unlimited, 3 users | Custom | No |
| Buffer | $30/mo, unlimited, 1 user | $80/mo, unlimited, 1 user | $195/mo, unlimited, 1 user | 3 channels, 30 posts, 1 user |
| Hootsuite | $99/user, unlimited, 1 user | $249/mo, unlimited, 3 users | Custom (Enterprise) | No |
| Later | $25/mo, 30 posts/profile, 1 user | $50/mo, 180 posts/profile, 2 users | $110/mo, unlimited, 4 users | No |
| SocialBee | $29/mo, unlimited, 1 user | $49/mo + add-ons, unlimited, 1 user | $99/mo + add-ons, unlimited, 3 users | No |
| Publer | $20/mo, unlimited, 1 user | $60/mo, unlimited, 1 user | $180/mo, unlimited, 1 user | 3 accounts, 10 posts each, 1 user |
| Sendible | $29/mo, 100 posts/day, 1 user | $89/mo, 200 posts/day, 4 users | $199/mo, 300 posts/day, 7 users | No |
| SocialPilot | $50/mo, unlimited, 1 user | $100/mo, unlimited, 3 users | $200/mo, unlimited, 6 users | No |
| Agorapulse | $79/user, unlimited, 1 user | $237/mo, unlimited, 3 users | Custom | 3 profiles, 10 posts total, 1 user |
| Loomly | $65/mo, unlimited, 3 users | $332/mo, unlimited, unlimited users | $332/mo, unlimited, unlimited users | 1 profile, 5 posts, 1 user |
FAQ: CoSchedule Alternatives
Is CoSchedule free?
CoSchedule offers a free Marketing Calendar with 1 user, 1 social profile, and up to 15 scheduled messages. This works for individual bloggers testing the platform, but teams will quickly need paid plans starting at $19/user/month.
Why does CoSchedule charge extra for Twitter/X?
Twitter/X changed its API pricing in 2023, significantly increasing costs for third-party tools. CoSchedule passes this cost to users as a $8-25/month add-on per Twitter profile. Most competitors either absorb this cost or restrict Twitter to paid plans rather than charging per-profile add-ons.
What is the best free CoSchedule alternative?
Publer offers the most capable free plan with 3 social accounts and 10 scheduled posts per account (no Twitter/X). Buffer’s free plan includes 3 channels with 10 posts per channel. Viraly’s free plan covers 3 profiles with 10 posts/month total. For engagement features, Agorapulse’s free plan includes 3 profiles with inbox access but limits to 10 scheduled posts total.
Which CoSchedule alternative has the best content recycling?
SocialBee offers the most sophisticated content recycling through its category system. You organize posts into themed categories with individual schedules, and content automatically cycles through each category. RecurPost specializes entirely in evergreen recycling with content libraries. Viraly adds AI caption variations to recycled content to keep posts fresh.
Does CoSchedule work with WordPress?
Yes, CoSchedule’s WordPress plugin is one of its strongest features, allowing you to schedule social posts alongside blog content directly from the WordPress editor. Few alternatives match this integration depth. Publer offers WordPress scheduling but as a separate platform rather than integrated plugin.
Which CoSchedule alternative is best for agencies?
Sendible offers the best agency features with white-label options, client dashboards, and bundled user/profile pricing. SocialPilot provides white-label reports and dashboards on higher plans with 500-post bulk scheduling. For agencies prioritizing flat-rate pricing, Viraly’s Agency plan at $99/month includes 50 profiles and 15 team members.
Which CoSchedule alternative has the best social inbox?
Agorapulse has the most comprehensive social inbox with unified comment, DM, and mention management, team assignment, collision detection, and saved replies. Sendible’s Priority Inbox and SocialBee’s Engage module also offer solid engagement features. Note that some alternatives like Viraly focus purely on publishing without inbox features.
How much does CoSchedule cost for a team of 5?
On Social Calendar ($19/user/month annual), a 5-person team pays $95/month. On Agency Calendar ($59/user/month annual), the same team pays $295/month. Add Twitter/X profiles and the cost increases further. Compare this to Viraly’s Agency plan at $99/month flat for up to 15 team members.
Can I migrate from CoSchedule to another tool?
Most alternatives do not offer direct CoSchedule import. You will need to export your content calendar (if CoSchedule allows) and reimport via CSV to tools that support bulk upload. SocialBee offers a migration tool for switching from other platforms. Plan for some manual setup time when switching.
What platforms does CoSchedule support?
CoSchedule supports 13 platforms: Facebook, Instagram, Twitter/X (paid add-on), LinkedIn, Pinterest, TikTok, YouTube Shorts, Threads, Bluesky, Mastodon, and Google Business Profile. This is comprehensive coverage, though the Twitter add-on cost surprises many users expecting it included.
Which CoSchedule alternative works best for small businesses?
Small businesses with limited budgets should consider Publer ($4-10/account) or Viraly ($19/month flat for 5 profiles). Both offer free plans to test before committing. Buffer provides simplicity if you do not need content recycling. Avoid per-user tools like Hootsuite or Agorapulse where costs multiply as your team grows.
Which CoSchedule alternative is best for social media managers?
Social media managers juggling multiple clients benefit from tools with workspace organization and client management. Sendible and SocialPilot offer strong agency features. For managers focused on content creation, SocialBee’s AI Copilot and content categories streamline workflow. Managers needing engagement features should consider Agorapulse despite its per-user pricing.
Does CoSchedule have a social inbox?
CoSchedule includes social inbox features starting with Social Calendar (Facebook and Instagram only) and expanding on Agency Calendar (all networks). This is more limited than dedicated engagement tools like Agorapulse and requires higher-tier plans for full access.
Can nonprofits get discounts on CoSchedule alternatives?
Many alternatives offer nonprofit discounts: Buffer (50%), Later (50% on annual Growth), Viraly (25% recurring), Hootsuite (50-75%), RecurPost (20%), Loomly (50% lifetime). Contact each tool directly with your nonprofit documentation to verify current discount availability.
Conclusion
The right CoSchedule alternative depends on what pushed you to look for alternatives to CoSchedule in the first place.
If per-user pricing is the main frustration: Viraly, Publer, or SocialBee offer flat-rate or per-account pricing that does not multiply as your team grows.
If you rely heavily on ReQueue: SocialBee’s content categories offer even more sophisticated recycling organization. RecurPost specializes entirely in evergreen content automation. Viraly adds AI caption variations in their content recycling feature to keep recycled posts fresh.
If you need better engagement tools: Agorapulse has the strongest social inbox, though its per-user pricing mirrors CoSchedule’s model. Sendible offers solid inbox features with bundled pricing that may work out cheaper for your team size.
If budget is the primary concern: Publer at $4-10/account delivers remarkable value with wide platform coverage. The free plans from Publer, Buffer, and Viraly let you test before committing.
There is no single best CoSchedule alternative for everyone. The right choice depends on your team size, required platforms, budget constraints, and which features you actually use. Most tools offer free trials – take advantage of them to find the fit that works for your workflow.